Nathan Weed received his Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Minnesota in 1992. He joined the CMU faculty in 2001 after nine years on the clinical psychology faculty at the University of Mississippi. His chief teaching, research, and clinical interests are in the area of clinical psychological assessment. He directs a psychological assessment research laboratory and a specialty training clinic, the Psychological Assessment Clinic (PAC), devoted to psychological assessment. Dr. Weed is Associate Editor of the Journal of Personality Assessment, published by Taylor & Francis. He is a Consulting Editor for Psychological Assessment, published by the American Psychological Association, and for Assessment, published by Sage.
My research centers on problems in construction and validation of psychological assessments, particularly those involving the assessment of personality and psychopathology. Recent scale construction projects have included the development and validation of MMPI-2 scales used to: (1) screen for substance abuse problems, (2) identify symptoms associated with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and (3) assess features of the Korean culture-bound syndrome of Hwa-Byung. Recent validation studies include examinations of: (1) the relative validity of commercially available computer-based test interpretations, (2) the validity of a Hindi version of the MMPI-2, and (3) the field reliability of clinical MMPI-2 interpretation. Many of my current projects apply a novel q-sort methodology to validate personality test inferences.
Recent journal articles:
Young, K. R., Weed, N. C., McCabe, B. J., Pudumjee, S., & Williams, J. E. (in press). Development of a q-set for MMPI-2 research with substance abusing populations. Cogent Psychology. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2016.1223900.
Deskovitz, M. A., Weed, N. C., Chakranarayan, C., & Williams, J. E. (2016). Interpretive reliability of two common MMPI-2 profiles. Cogent Psychology, 3: 1161287. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2016.1161287.
Deskovitz, M. A., Weed, N. C., McLaughlan, J. K., & Williams, J. E. (2016). Interpretive reliability of six computer-based test interpretation programs for the MMPI-2. Assessment, 23, 250-261. doi: 10.1177/1073191115584970
Pant, H., McCabe, B. J., Deskovitz, M. A., Weed, N. C., & Williams, J. E. (2014). Diagnostic reliability of MMPI-2 computer-based test interpretations. Psychological Assessment, 26, 916-924. doi: 10.1037/a0036469.
Han, K., Park, H., Weed, N. C., Lim, J., Johnson, A., & Joles, C. (2013). Gender differences on the MMPI across American and Korean adult and adolescent normative samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 197-206. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.754360
Cox, A. C., Pant, H., Gilson, A. N., Rodriguez, J. S., Young, K. R., Kwon, S., & Weed, N. C. (2012). Effects of augmenting response options on MMPI-2 RC Scale psychometrics. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 613-619. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.700464