Nathan Weed received his Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Minnesota in 1992. He joined the CMU faculty in 2001 after nine years on the clinical psychology faculty at the University of Mississippi. His chief teaching, research, and clinical interests are in the area of clinical psychological assessment. He directs a psychological assessment research laboratory and a specialty training clinic,
the Psychological Assessment Clinic (PAC), devoted to psychological assessment. Dr. Weed is Associate Editor of the Journal of Personality Assessment, published by Taylor & Francis. He is a Consulting Editor for
Psychological Assessment, published by the American Psychological Association, and forAssessment, published by Sage.
My research centers on problems in construction and validation of psychological assessments, particularly those involving the assessment of personality and psychopathology. Recent scale construction projects have included the development and validation of MMPI-2 scales used to: (1) screen for substance abuse problems, (2) identify symptoms associated with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and (3) assess features of the Korean culture-bound syndrome of Hwa-Byung. Recent validation studies include examinations of: (1) the relative validity of commercially available computer-based test interpretations, (2) the validity of a Hindi version of the MMPI-2, and (3) the field reliability of clinical MMPI-2 interpretation. Many of my current projects apply a novel q-sort methodology to validate personality test inferences.
Recent journal articles:
Dodd, C. G., Courrégé, S. C., & Weed, N. C. (in press). Evaluating the descriptive validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – Restructured Form and the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory in a rural sample of juvenile offenders. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19955.07208
Han, K., Colarelli, S. M., & Weed, N. C. (in press). Methodological and statistical advances in the consideration of cultural diversity in assessment: A critical review of group classification and measurement invariance testing. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16638.23368
White, J. V., Han, K., Weed, N. C., Lim, J., Moon, K., Yook, K., & Kim, J. (2019). A comparative evaluation of Korean MMPI-A (the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent) and MMPI-A-RF (the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- Adolescent-Restructured Form) substance abuse scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22843
Courrégé, S. C., & Weed, N. C. (2019). The role of common method variance in MMPI-2-RF augmentation. Psychological Assessment, 31, 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000634
Dodd, C. G., Courrégé, S. C., Weed, N. C., & Deskovitz, M. A. (2018). A comparison of the descriptive information from the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF. Advance online publication. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1504054
Cox, A. C., Courrégé, S. C., Feder, A. H., & Weed, N. C. (2017). Effects of augmenting response options of the MMPI-2-RF: An extension of previous findings. Cogent Psychology, 4, 1323988. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1323988
Young, K. R., Weed, N. C., McCabe, B. J., Pudumjee, S., & Williams, J. E. (2016). Development of a Q-set for MMPI-2 research with substance abusing populations. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1223900. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1223900
Deskovitz, M. A., Weed, N. C., Chakranarayan, C., & Williams, J. E. (2016). Interpretive reliability of two common MMPI-2 profiles. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1161287. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1161287
Deskovitz, M. A., Weed, N. C., McLaughlan, J. K., & Williams, J. E. (2016). Interpretive reliability of six computer-based test interpretation programs for the MMPI-2. Assessment, 23, 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115584970